Legal Opinion

Farmers & Merchants State Bank v. H. E. Behrens Manufacturing Co.

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided April 4, 1924PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*853Statement.

Bronson, Oh. J.

The cause of action is upon a promissory note. The facts are: Plaintiff is a banking corporation located at Steele, N. D. Defendant is a corporation engaged in mill work at Rargo, North Dakota. Defendant had a contract with Cowan & Company, a corporation, to sell some of its stock. This Cowan & Company had sold .for defendant some of its stock in 1917. Then defendant had furnished to it some blank note forms with defendant’s name therein as payee and had argued to accept notes in payment of stock sold. In 1920 defendant made another agreement with this Cowan & Company…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Martinson v. KershnerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Fleming v. SherwoodNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1912
  3. Lavell v. BullockNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1919
  4. Bank of Gilby v. FarnsworthNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1897

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. In Re MannDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1952
  2. Bratten, Admr. v. McKelveyOhio Court of Appeals · 1939
  3. Delta Metals, Inc. v. Alfin Manufacturing Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1960
  4. Weinbergen v. BartelsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1927
  5. Bank of Conway v. StaryNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1924

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API