Scanlon v. GREENBERG TRAURIG, LLP
District Court, District of Columbia
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM & ORDER
ROYCE C. LAMBERTH, Chief Judge.
Before the Court is defendant Michael Scanlon’s Motion [1] to Determine Availability of Objection. Upon consideration of the motion [1], Greenberg Traurig’s opposition thereto [3], the reply [4], the government’s memorandum regarding the motion [7], and the applicable law, the Court will deny the motion for the reasons set forth below.
I. BACKGROUND
In November 2004, defendant pled guilty to a fraud scheme in which he and Jack Abramoff defrauded their Indian tribe clients of over $20 million. On February 11, 2011, Judge Huvelle sentenced…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Dolan v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
- United States v. Lionel Reifler, Glenn B. Laken, John M. Black, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006
- United States v. OjeikereCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2008
- United States v. MartinezDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 1997
3Cited by3 opinions
- United States v. EmorDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
- (PC) Green v. ChamberlainDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2021
- Johnson v. Indianola, Mississippi Police DepartmentDistrict Court, N.D. Mississippi · 2020