Legal Opinion

Marsh v. Kendall

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided May 10, 1902No. 12,604PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Error from Smith district court; R. M. Pickler, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

*49The opinion of the court was delivered by

Dostek, G. J. :

This was a suit for a balance due on a promissory note. Payments had been made on the note, but the number and amounts were in dispute. The jury returned a verdict for plaintiff for $547.80. This was in accordance with a claim of defendants as to the principal of the amount due. However, the verdict did not include interest to the date of its rendition on the balance of principal remaining due when the last partial payment was made. This was evident. The plaintiff moved for a-new trial because of the insufficiency of the verdict,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Carr v. MinerIllinois Supreme Court · 1866
  2. West v. Milwaukee, Lake Shore & Western Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1882
  3. James v. MoreyIllinois Supreme Court · 1867

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. St. Louis, El Reno & Western Railway Co. v. OliverSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1906
  2. Jacobson v. Mutual Benefit Health & Accident Ass'nNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1941
  3. Calnon v. Fidelity-Phenix Fire Ins.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1925
  4. Rudnick v. JacobsSupreme Court of Delaware · 1938
  5. Brewer v. Oil Well Supply Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1927

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API