Legal Opinion

Hardiman v. Brown

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided January 3, 1895PublishedCited by 16 opinions

Tort, for personal injuries occasioned to the plaintiff, on January 9, 1887, by being struck and run over by a runaway horse with a sleigh attached, driven by the defendant. The plaintiff having died, the action was prosecuted by her administrator. At the trial in the Superior Court, before Maynard, J., the jury returned a verdict for the plaintiff; and the defendant alleged exceptions, the nature of which appears in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtField, C. J.

The question put to Dr. Clark called for an opinion upon “ the exciting cause of the illness ” from which the plaintiff suffered from January 9, 1887, till her death on May 18,1892. The nature of the illness was described in the question.* The answer of Dr. Clark was: “ From the result of the *586autopsy, knowing that there was a tumor of the brain, I presume that was the exciting cause of the troubles from which she suffered.” The exceptions recite that, when Dr. Clark was called as a witness, “ the counsel for the defendant, upon being asked by the counsel for the plaintiff if he wanted him to…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Perkins v. StickneyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1882
  2. Finnegan v. Fall River Gas Works Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1893

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. BellinoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1947
  2. Boston Gas Co. v. Assessors of BostonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1956
  3. Swanson v. HoodWashington Supreme Court · 1918
  4. Monahan v. Economy Grocery Stores Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1933
  5. Toland v. Paine Furniture Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1901

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API