Legal Opinion · Dissent

Maye v. State

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided December 2, 2010No. 2007-CT-02147-SCTPublished

1DissentRandolph, Justice

¶24. Although the Court is vacating the Court of Appeals judgment and remanding for a new trial, the Court grants Maye the right to reassert his venue request, an issue I believe is foreclosed under the particular facts of this case, unless the trial court ignores our precedent. See McCune v. State, 989 So.2d 310, 316-18 (Miss.2008) (citing White v. State, 495 So.2d 1346, 1349 (Miss.1986)).

¶ 25. Maye waived his constitutional right to be tried in the county where the crime occurred when he sought and received a change of venue from Jefferson Davis County to Lamar County. The trial court…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Duplantis v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Simon v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Greenlee v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Kearse v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2000

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API