United States v. Ralph M. Crow
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
KOELSCH, Circuit Judge:
Crow urges but two grounds for reversal of his conviction:
*7621. That the information does not charge a crime,1
2. That the evidence is insufficient to establish guilt.
Neither has merit.
1. The use of a “bare bones” information — that is one employing the statutory language alone — is quite common and entirely permissible so long as the statute sets forth fully, directly and clearly all essential elements of the crime to be punished. United States v. Matthews, 572 F.2d 208 (9th Cir.1978).
Here, the information tracked the language of the pertinent regulation CFR 101-20.305;…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Glasser v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Paul John Carbo, Frank Palermo, Joseph Sica, Louis Tom Dragna, and Truman K. Gibson, Jr. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1963
- United States v. Gregory Martin MatthewsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978
3Cited by18 opinions
- State v. KjorsvikWashington Supreme Court · 1991
- United States v. FernandezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- United States v. Betty SalisburyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1993
- United States v. McArthurCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1997
- United States v. Kevin WoodruffCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.