Legal Opinion

State v. Searcy

Idaho Court of Appeals

Decided November 21, 1991No. 19144PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

This is an appeal from an amended judgment of conviction for robbery and first degree murder. The amended judgment was entered following a hearing ordered by the Supreme Court in State v. Searcy, 118 Idaho 632, 798 P.2d 914 (1990), to correct a sentencing error.

In the present appeal, Searcy raises only two issues, neither of which relate to the proceeding conducted following the remand from the earlier appeal. First, he argues that he was denied due process during the trial proceedings because he was precluded by I.C. § 18-207 from asserting insanity as a defense. Second, he argues that…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. SearcyIdaho Supreme Court · 1990
  2. State v. Van VlackIdaho Supreme Court · 1937

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. SivakIdaho Supreme Court · 1995
  2. State v. SearcyIdaho Court of Appeals · 1993
  3. Dopp v. Idaho Commission of Pardons & ParoleIdaho Court of Appeals · 2007
  4. Sivak v. BladesDistrict Court, D. Idaho · 2023
  5. State v. Barryngton Eugene SearcyIdaho Court of Appeals · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API