Dopp v. Idaho Commission of Pardons & Parole

LANSING, Judge.

Sidney David Dopp appeals the dismissal of his petition for a writ of habeas corpus. He contends that the district court erred in holding that the individual who conducted a psychological examination of Dopp in antici pation of his parole hearing was not required to be licensed, and in concluding that Idaho Code § 20-223 did not create a right that Dopp could enforce. We affirm.

I

BACKGROUND

This case returns to us after a remand ordered in Dopp v. Idaho Com’n of Pardons & Parole, 139 Idaho 657, 84 P.3d 593 (Ct.App.2004). Dopp was sentenced to prison for several felonies,…