Legal Opinion

Munoz v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided March 10, 1926No. 9986PublishedCited by 8 opinions

The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the Court

HAWKINS, Judge.

Conviction is for sodomy, with punishment fixed at five years in the penitentiary.

The undisputed evidence shows that appellant performed the disgusting, abominable and nauseating act of using his mouth upon the person of one Meyers. •

The point is made that, however vile and detestable the act may have been, it does not come within the definition of “sodomy” as known to the common law and adopted by legislative enactment in our State. (Art. 524 P. C. [1925]). Such has been the uniform holding of this court. Prindle v. State, 31 Tex. Cr. R. 551, 21 S. W. 360, 37 Am. St. Rep. 833;…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Kinnan v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1910
  2. Prindle v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1893
  3. Lewis v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1896
  4. Harvey v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1909
  5. Mitchell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1906

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Pruett v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1970
  2. People v. SchmittMichigan Supreme Court · 1936
  3. Furstonburg v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1945
  4. Bennett v. AbramNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1953
  5. Small v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1930

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API