Legal Opinion

Pulu v. Talalotu

High Court of American Samoa

Decided October 20, 2003No. LT No. 27-02Published

1Opinion of the Court

*290OPINION AND ORDER

On January 15, 2002, Defendant Winnie Su'apaia (“Winnie”) sought to register a separation agreement (“Separation Agreement”) regarding a house located on the Pulu family’s land. The Separation Agreement was executed between Winnie and Defendant Pulu F. Talalotu (“Pulu”), the sa 'o of .the Pulu family. Plaintiff Michael Pulu (“Michael”) timely filed bis objection to the registration of the Separation Agreement.

In accordance with Á.S.C.A. § 43.0302, this matter was referred to the Secretary of Samoan Affairs. However, after two hearings the parties were unable to resolve their…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Foley v. AllenCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1948
  2. Kiel v. BrinkmanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API