Legal Opinion

Kiel v. Brinkman

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided April 19, 1984No. C14-82-767CVPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JUNELL, Justice.

This is an appeal from a judgment of the District Court that Appellant, Earlene Kiel, has no right, title or interest in the subject real property. Appellant argues that because the property was acquired during the marriage of the two parties, and Appellee had acquired a loan during marriage that was used to pay an encumbrance on the property, then the property was the community property of the parties as a matter of law. Appellant further asserts that an improper charge was submitted to the jury. We affirm.

Appellant and Appellee were married on June 3, 1955. At that time Fred…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Hilley v. HilleyTexas Supreme Court · 1961
  2. Tarver v. TarverTexas Supreme Court · 1965
  3. Taylor v. Sanford, AdministratorTexas Supreme Court · 1917
  4. Smith v. BussTexas Supreme Court · 1940
  5. Braugh v. PhillipsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1977

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Operation Rescue-National v. Planned Parenthood of Houston & Southeast Texas, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)1997
  2. Ryno v. TyraCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1988
  3. Delma Ramirez Deleon, Irma Gomez, Josefina Castor, Olga Ramirez Niaves, Oralia De La Rosa, Gloria R. Dunford, and San Juanita R. Rodriguez v. Oliverio C. Ramirez and Maria Luisa Ramirez, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2017
  4. Operation Rescue-National v. Planned Parenthood of Houston & Southeast Texas, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)1997
  5. Pulu v. TalalotuHigh Court of American Samoa · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API