Legal Opinion

Griffith v. UPS, Inc.

Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided November 13, 2009No. 106,706. Released for Publication by Order of the Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma, Division No. 3Published

1Opinion of the Court

BAY MITCHELL, Chief Judge.

¶ 1 Petitioner Donald P. Griffith (Claimant) seeks review of an order of a three-judge panel of the Workers’ Compensation Court. The panel affirmed the trial court’s award of temporary total disability (TTD) benefits, permanent partial disability (PPD) benefits, and denial of Claimant’s request for additional compensation based upon actual loss of earning capacity. On review, Claimant contends the court erred in denying his claim for compensation for his loss of earning capacity.

¶ 2 Claimant is a 61-year-old, who worked for approximately 20 years as a route driver…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Parks v. Norman Municipal HospitalSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1984
  2. Samman v. Multiple Injury Trust FundSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2001
  3. Arrow Tool & Gauge v. MeadSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2000
  4. Oldham v. Drummond Board of Education of Independent School District I-85Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1985
  5. Blythe v. University of OklahomaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2003

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API