Legal Opinion
Lawyer Disciplinary Board v. Moore
West Virginia Supreme Court
Decided December 12, 2003No. 25794PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Per curiam
The petitioner, Arch A. Moore, Jr., (“the petitioner”) has filed a Petition for Reinstatement seeking reinstatement of his license to practice law in West Virginia. The petition, materials related thereto gathered and submitted by the Office of Disciplinary Counsel and a report from that Office were considered by a Hearing Panel Subcommittee (“the Hearings Panel”) of the Supreme Court of Appeals of West Virginia Lawyer Disciplinary Board (“the Board”). We have before us the written Recommendation of the Hearing Panel,1 briefs from the petitioner and the Board, and voluminous materials that…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Committee on Legal Ethics of the West Virginia State Bar v. McCorkleWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1994
- In the Matter of HissMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1975
- In Re: BrownWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1980
- Committee on Legal Ethics v. RoarkWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1989
- In Re the Reinstatement of PETERSONSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Lawyer Disciplinary Board v. BallWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2006
- In Re Petition for REINSTATEMENT OF L. Dante DiTRAPANOWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2014
- Griffin v. ARX Holding CorporationDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2016
- Moore v. CNA Insurance Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 2004
- In Re Petition for REINSTATEMENT OF L. Dante DiTRAPANOWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2014
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.