City of Duluth v. Stephenson
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
KALITOWSKI, Judge.
Appellants argue that the trial court erred by granting the City of Duluth’s “quick-take” condemnation petition. Respondent argues that the trial court’s order is not appealable at this time since Stephenson does not question the public necessity for the taking but only challenges the necessity for the quick-take and the city’s compliance with procedural requirements. We agree with respondent that Stephenson’s appeal is premature.
FACTS
In June of 1991 the. City of Duluth commenced a condemnation action against William R. Stephenson, Jr. and Stephenson & Company Real…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- County of Blue Earth v. StauffenbergSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
- Alexandria Lake Area Service Region v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
- State v. Wren, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1966
- Village of Roseville v. Sunset Memorial Park Assn. Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1962
3Cited by1 opinion
- Judd v. State ex rel. HumphreyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1992