Legal Opinion

Judd v. State ex rel. Humphrey

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided August 18, 1992No. C3-92-869PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

-SPECIAL TERM OPINION

WOZNIAK, Chief Judge.

FACTS

Appellant State of Minnesota commenced this eminent domain proceeding to acquire property from respondent Martin Judd. Judd filed a timely appeal of the commissioners’ award of damages with the district court, but did not serve a copy of the notice of appeal on appellant within the 40-day appeal period. See Minn.Stat. § 117.145 (1990).

Appellant moved to dismiss, arguing that respondent’s failure to serve the notice of appeal deprived the trial court of subject matter jurisdiction. The trial court denied the motion, and purported to certify an…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hunt v. Nevada State BankSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1969
  2. In Re State & Regents Building Asbestos CasesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
  3. In Re Condemnation of Lands Owned by LuhrsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1945
  4. City of Duluth v. StephensonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1992

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. American Sharecom, Inc. v. LDB International Corp.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API