Legal Opinion

Firestone v. Wahl

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 8, 1955No. Civ. 4960PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMussell, J.

This action was brought to recover the purchase price of 60 tons of fertilizer and 20 tons of Ammo Shell sulphate delivered to defendant’s ranch in Kern County.

The trial court found that between January 21, 1953, and January 30, 1953, plaintiffs sold and delivered to defendant 40 tons of fertilizer of the reasonable value of $3,090; that it was not true that the defendant ordered an additional 20 tons of fertilizer and 20 tons of Ammo Shell sulphate; that said additional fertilizer and sulphate were ordered by John A. Wahl, defendant’s son; that it was not true that the defendant paid $800 on…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Otis Elevator Co. v. BerryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938
  2. Jules Levy & Bro. v. A. Mautz & Co.California Court of Appeal · 1911
  3. London v. ZacharyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
  4. Patterson v. John P. Mills Organization Inc.California Supreme Court · 1928
  5. Dickerman v. Ohashi Importing Co.California Court of Appeal · 1923

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Hollywood National Bank v. International Business MacHines Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1974
  2. Martindell v. BodreroCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
  3. Orlopp v. Willardson Co.California Court of Appeal · 1965

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API