Legal Opinion

London v. Zachary

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 29, 1949No. Civ. 16872PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMoore, P. J.

Defendant Irving Zachary appeals from a judgment for damages resulting from the breach of a contract for the sale of a wholesale wine distributing business.

In January, 1946, appellant caused to be prepared a contract in quadruplicate for the sale of such business to respondent for $3,000. Spaces were left in the instrument for the date, price and terms of payment.

After the omitted data had been orally agreed upon, respondent inserted them in two of the copies which he signed. One of the copies bearing respondent’s signature together with a second copy “not filled in” he gave to appellant with…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Harding v. RobinsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
  2. Otis Elevator Co. v. BerryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938
  3. Frank Meline Co. v. KleinbergerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
  4. Patterson v. John P. Mills Organization Inc.California Supreme Court · 1928
  5. Brandt v. BrandtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Sunset-Sternau Food Co. v. BonziCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964
  2. Bank of America v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
  3. Hollywood National Bank v. International Business MacHines Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1974
  4. Armstrong Manors v. BurrisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
  5. Ribiero v. DotsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API