Legal Opinion
Moody v. Cummings
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided April 14, 2010No. 2009-CA-1233PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MAX N. TOBIAS, JR., Judge.
In this appeal, the defendants, Charlotte Cummings (“Cummings”) and the Sewerage & Water Board of New Orleans (“S & WB”)(collectively referred to as “the defendants”), seek a decrease in the general damages awarded by the trial court to the plaintiff, Miguel Moody (“Moody”), for injuries he sustained in a collision, and a reversal of the award for future medical expenses. Moody answered the appeal seeking an increase in his general damage award. For the reasons set below, we affirm the trial court’s judgment.
An automobile accident occurred at the intersection of…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Rosell v. EscoSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1989
- Stobart v. State Through DOTDSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1993
- Youn v. Maritime Overseas Corp.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1993
- Housley v. CeriseSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1991
- Lucas v. Ins. Co. of North AmericaSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1977
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Wendel v. Travelers Insurance Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2014
- Maloney Cinque, L.L.C. v. Pacific Insurance Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2012
- Sam Staub Enterprises, Inc. v. ChapitalLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2012
- Gaunt v. Progressive Security InsuranceLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2012
- Mixter v. WilsonLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2010
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.