Legal Opinion
Gaunt v. Progressive Security Insurance
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided June 8, 2012No. 2011-CA-1094PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MADELEINE M. LANDRIEU, Judge.
liThe defendants: U-Haul International, Inc.; U-Haul Company of Georgia; and Azhar M. Khan d/b/a CITGO Snack and Pack [hereinafter collectively referred to as “U-Haul” or “the U-Haul defendants”], appeal the trial court’s judgment, which found them ninety percent at fault for damages suffered by the plaintiffs, James and Caroline Gaunt, as a result of an accident involving a U-Haul auto transport. For the reasons that follow, we affirm in part and reverse in part.
FACTS AND PROCEEDINGS BELOW
On December 29, 2005, Mr. Omar Erazo was driving a rented U-Haul van on…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Rosell v. EscoSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1989
- Arceneaux v. DomingueSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1978
- Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1977
- Youn v. Maritime Overseas Corp.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1993
- Watson v. State Farm Fire and Cas. Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1985
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Williams v. MathieuLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2014
- Craft v. Ports Am. Gulfport, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2019
- Clinton Crowe v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, American Service Insurance, Inc., and Corey AmosLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2020
- Clinton Crowe v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, American Service Insurance, Inc., and Corey AmosLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2020
- Craft v. Ports Am. Gulfport, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2019
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.