Legal Opinion

Ward v. Healy

California Supreme Court

Decided December 23, 1895No. Sac. No. 89PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Lassen County and from an order denying a new trial. W. T. Hasten, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtGaroutte, J.

This is a motion to dismiss an appeal upon the ground of failure to file the printed transcript . *588within the time provided by law. Rule XII of this court provides that a written transcript in civil cases may be filed with the clerk of this court if, when presented for filing, it be accompanied with sufficient funds to pay the expenses'of printing the same, and that the clerk, upon receipt thereof, shall cause the transcript to be printed, and to the printed copy shall annex his certificate, etc. Appellant, in line with the foregoing rule of the court, transmitted to the clerk the written…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hanson v. McCueCalifornia Supreme Court · 1872
  2. Carter v. PaigeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
  3. Chapman v. Bank of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Murphy v. KrummCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Murphy v. KrummCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API