DeClue ex rel. DeClue v. Murrell
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
MANFORD, Judge.
This is a civil action seeking recovery of damages for personal injury. The judgment is affirmed.
Appellants present a sole point, which charges the trial court erred in submitting two converse instructions because the language used therein was not substantially *238the same as that used in the verdict-directing instructions.
No transcript has been provided, as the parties agree on the facts. In summary, the pertinent facts are as follows:
On May 23,1982, Patrick A. DeClue, who was six years of age, was playing baseball in respondents’ backyard. Patrick, along with other children, was…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Fowler v. Park Corp.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1984
- Hudson v. CarrSupreme Court of Missouri · 1984
- Smith v. WellsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1930
- Marshall v. EdlinMissouri Court of Appeals · 1985
- McGowan v. HoffmanMissouri Court of Appeals · 1980
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Gilbert v. K.T.I., Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1988
- Turner v. Norfolk & Western Railway Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1990
- E.A.U., Inc. v. R. Webbe Corp.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1990
- Reason v. PayneMissouri Court of Appeals · 1990
- Walsh v. St. Louis National Baseball Club, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1992
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.