Marshall v. Edlin

NUGENT, Judge.

Defendants Thomas and Gary Edlin appeal from a verdict and judgment in plaintiff Brett Marshall’s favor for breach of a bilateral oral contract to harvest defendants’ crop. Defendants contend that the verdict was against the weight of the evidence and was not supported by sufficient evidence and that the court erred in instructing the jury. We affirm.

Plaintiff and defendants are farmers, but plaintiff does not own his own property; he owns farm equipment and hires out to do custom farm work, including combining. He regularly advertises in the local newspaper for such custom…