Legal Opinion
United States v. International Business Machines Corp.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided April 6, 1976No. 69 Civ. 200 (DNE)PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
EDELSTEIN, Chief Judge:
This memorandum is occasioned by the motion of Robert L. Brueck, president of MRI Systems Corporation and a nonparty in this antitrust litigation, for an order quashing or modifying or alternatively providing protection against a subpoena duces tecum served upon him by defendant International Business Machines Corporation [hereinafter referred to as IBM] on December 23, 1975.
Preliminarily, the court must adjudicate the motion of Mr. Brueck’s counsel for permission to appear in this action for the purpose of “presenting motions for protective orders of the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Wilson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
- United States v. FleischmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
- American Communications Assn., C. I. O. v. DoudsSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
- United States v. International Business Machines Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1974
- McLean v. Prudential Steamship Co.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 1965
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- United States v. International Business Machines Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1979
- United States v. SteinDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2007
- Cantaline v. Raymark Industries, Inc.District Court, S.D. Florida · 1984
- In Re Marriage of StephensCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
- First American Corp. v. Price Waterhouse LLPDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1998
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.