Legal Opinion

Darby v. Furman Co., Inc.

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided March 15, 1999No. 24919Published

1Opinion of the Court

TOAL, Justice:

This matter is before the Court on a writ of certiorari to review the Court of Appeals’ decision in Darby v. The Furman Co., No. 97-UP-241 (S.C.Ct.App. filed April 4, 1997). The case involves a breach of fiduciary duty claim against a real estate broker. The Court of Appeals remanded for further factual findings. We reverse.

Factual/Procedural Background

Petitioner Gwendolyn N. Darby (“Darby”) owned a large tract of land in Greenville County. In 1987, Darby contacted respondent Furman Company, Inc. (“Furman”) and spoke with its agent, Bill Fogleman (“Fogleman”). Darby expressed…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. James Benjamin Hamby, Bankrupt v. St. Paul Mercury Indemnity Company, CreditorCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1954
  2. Designer Showrooms, Inc. v. KelleyCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1991
  3. Bost v. Bankers Fire & Marine InsuranceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1963
  4. Pollitzer v. LongSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API