Legal Opinion

Bost v. Bankers Fire & Marine Insurance

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided April 16, 1963No. 18055PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Bussey, Justice.

The plaintiff, appellant in this action, seeks to recover from the defendant, respondent Bankers Fire and Marine Insurance Company, under a contract of insurance, for the destruction of a house trailer by wind storm.

On motion of the defendant insurance company, State Bank and Trust Company, New Ellenton, South Carolina, was made a party to the action because of a mortgage held by it covering the said trailer.

The policy insured against loss by fire, windstorm and extended coverage in the amount of $3,000.00, and was first issued on November 30, 1956, at which time the trailer…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Keistler Co. v. Aetna Ins. Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1923
  2. Madden & Co. v. Phoenix Ins.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1904
  3. Powell v. Insurance CompanySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1914
  4. Norris v. Hartford Fire Ins.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1900
  5. Maryland Casualty Co. v. Gaffney Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1913

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Pitts v. New York Life InsuranceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1966
  2. Preferred Risk Mutual Insurance Company v. ThomasCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1967
  3. Preferred Risk Mutual Insurance v. ThomasDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 1966
  4. Preferred Risk Mutual Insurance v. ThomasCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1967
  5. Darby v. Furman Co., Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API