Toennies v. Quantum Chemical Corp.
Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ERIC ANDELL, Justice.
In this employment discrimination case, we are asked to determine if the trial court erred in submitting a jury charge that asked if appellant, Ralf Toennies, was discharged “because of’ his age rather than asking if his age was “a motivating factor” in his discharge. We reverse.
Facts
The appellant, Ralf Toennies, had worked for years as an engineer for DuPont when appellee, Quantum Chemical Corporation, in 1987, bought the facility where he was employed. Quantum promoted Toennies to Senior Principal Engineer in 1989.
Toennies’s evaluations from 1987 to 1992 showed…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Price Waterhouse v. HopkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Allen v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- United States Postal Service Board of Governors v. AikensSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Spencer v. Eagle Star Insurance Co. of AmericaTexas Supreme Court · 1994
- Island Recreational Development Corp. v. Republic of Texas Savings Ass'nTexas Supreme Court · 1986
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Quantum Chemical Corp. v. ToenniesTexas Supreme Court · 2001
- Transcontinental Gas Pipeline Corp. v. Texaco, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2001
- In re WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2017
- Quantum Chemical Corp. v. ToenniesTexas Supreme Court · 2001
- Quantum Chemical Corp. v. ToenniesTexas Supreme Court · 2001
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.