Quantum Chemical Corp. v. Toennies

I respectfully dissent. The several reasons why Section 107(a) of the Civil Rights Act of 19911 did not eliminate the United States Supreme Court’s requirement in Price Waterhouse v. Hopkins2 that a plaintiff in an employment discrimination “pretext” case must prove that an illegitimate consideration was a determinative factor in an employer’s decision have been thoroughly and convincingly explained by the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit in Watson v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority3 No one questions that Section 21.125(a) of the Texas Labor Code,4 first…