Cook Specialty Co. v. Schrlock
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
WALDMAN, District Judge.
Defendant Machinery Systems, Inc. (“MSI”) contracted to sell plaintiff a machine known as a Dries & Krump Hydraulic Press Brake. When the machine was lost in transit, plaintiff sued defendants to recover for the loss. Presently before the court is plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment and defendant MSI’s Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment.
I. LEGAL STANDARD
In considering a motion for summary judgment, the court must consider whether the pleadings, depositions, answers to interrogatories and admissions on file, together with the affidavits, show there is no…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Arnold Pontiac-Gmc, Inc. v. General Motors CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1986
- Larsen v. A.C. Carpenter, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 1985
- Miller v. . HarveyNew York Court of Appeals · 1917
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.