Legal Opinion
Medford LLC v. U.S. Bank, N.A. and Nathan F. Smith
District Court, D. Oregon
Decided December 22, 2025No. 1:24-cv-02021Unknown
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON MEDFORD DIVISION MEDFORD LLC, Case No. 1:24-cv-02021-CL Plaintiff, OPINION AND ORDER v. U.S. BANK, N.A. and NATHAN F. SMITH, Defendants. MCSHANE, Judge: Plaintiff Medford LLC moves for a Temporary Restraining Order (“TRO”) to prevent “imminent eviction” while Plaintiff seeks to void foreclosure and quiet title to real property in Medford, Oregon. Mot. TRO 2, ECF No. 22; Mem. Mot. TRO 1, ECF 22-1. Because Plaintiff fails to establish likelihood of success on the merits, its Emergency Motion for Temporary Restraining Order, ECF No.…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Winter v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2008
- Stuhlbarg International Sales Company, Inc., a California Corporation, D/B/A Sisco v. John D. Brush and Company, Inc., a New York CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Harris v. County of OrangeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
- United States v. PaynerSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Cindy Garcia v. Google, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.