Legal Opinion
Hubert v. Collard
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided May 15, 1940No. 8930PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BAUGH, Justice.
Appeal is from a judgment, after trial to a jury on special issues, in favor of Collard, plaintiff below, against Hubert, defendant below, in the sum of $225 for conversion by Hubert of oil well casing belonging to Collard.
The following substantial facts appear: In April, 1936, Hubert executed an oil and gas lease on a tract of land owned by him in Bell County to Collard. Collard assigned the lease to Summers on April 24, 1936, who employed Hickey & McClung to drill a well. Collard loaned them the casing in question in May, 1936, which they placed in the well; but did not drill…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Moore v. Carey Bros. Oil Co.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1925
- Meers v. Frick-Reid Supply Corp.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1939
- Pearson v. BlackCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1938
- Moore v. Carey Bros. Oil Co.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1925
- Armstrong v. Federal Supply Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1929
3Cited by6 opinions
- Cox v. RhodesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1950
- Fike v. Riddle, Texas Court of Appeals, 12th District (Tyler)1984
- Donnell v. GrayLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1948
- Crabb v. Keystone Pipe & Supply Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1944
- Cox v. RhodesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1950
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.