Legal Opinion

Armstrong v. Federal Supply Co.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided April 11, 1929No. 780PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGallagher, C. J.

This suit was instituted by the Federal Supply Company, a corporation, one of the appellees herein, against J. E. Armstrong, appellant, and C. C. Curtis, another appellee hei-ein, to recover judgment against said Curtis on a promissory note in the principal sum of $702, and to foreclose two chattel mortgages given by him on a well-drilling outfit and certain well casing. Said supply company further alleged in its petition that appellant was engaged in removing said casing from a well in which it had been placed by Curtis, and that he would remove the same therefrom and from the premises and…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Houston & Texas Central Railroad v. RobertsTexas Supreme Court · 1908
  2. Terry v. CrosswyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1924
  3. Southwestern Oil & Gas Co. v. Kimball Oil & Development Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1920
  4. Standard Oil Co. v. BarlowSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1917
  5. Bellows Falls Canal Co. v. WalpoleSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1912

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Brazos River Conservation & Reclamation District v. AdkissonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1943
  2. Meers v. Frick-Reid Supply Corp.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1939
  3. Cox v. RhodesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1950
  4. Cox v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1944
  5. Clark v. ClarkCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1937

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API