Legal Opinion

Gillespie v. City of Northampton

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided July 14, 2011PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCordy, J.

In this case, brought pursuant to G. L. c. 30A, § 14, and G. L. c. 231 A, we are asked to decide whether the imposition of $275 in filing fees to obtain judicial review of a final decision of a municipal parking clerk regarding a parking citation offends the Massachusetts Constitution. Vincent Gillespie and Edward Hamel, the plaintiffs, each dispute the validity of parking citations received in the city of Northampton. They appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court that the statutory scheme that imposes such fees for review of a municipal parking clerk’s adjudication of the citation,…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. City of Cleburne v. Cleburne Living Center, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Goldberg v. KellySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  4. Armstrong v. ManzoSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  5. Washington v. GlucksbergSupreme Court of the United States · 1997

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. Wilbur W., a juvenileMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2018
  2. Doe No. 1 v. Secretary of EducationMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2018
  3. Burke v. Board of Appeal on Motor Vehicle Liability Polices and BondsMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2016
  4. Crawford v. BlueDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2017
  5. Murphy v. Massachusetts Turnpike AuthorityMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2012

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API