Legal Opinion

Kloppenburg v. Queen Size Shoes, Inc.

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided February 18, 1986No. 67486PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

704 S.W.2d 234 (1986)

Joan E. KLOPPENBURG, Claimant-Respondent,

v.

QUEEN SIZE SHOES, INC., and Insurance Company of North America, Employer and Insurer-Appellants.

No. 67486.

Supreme Court of Missouri, En Banc.

February 18, 1986.

William W. Francis, Jr., Springfield, for employer and insurer-appellants.

Jerry L. Reynolds, Larry B. Moore, Springfield, for claimant-respondent.

DONNELLY, Judge.

Respondent, Joan E. Kloppenburg, was injured in a fall while she was working as a salesperson in a retail shoe store. She filed for compensation under the Workers' Compensation Law § 287.010, RSMo 1978, et seq. Her…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Ricks v. H. K. Porter, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1969
  2. Dehoney v. BW Brake CompanySupreme Court of Missouri · 1954
  3. Parrish v. Kansas City Security ServiceMissouri Court of Appeals · 1984

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Hampton v. Big Boy Steel ErectionSupreme Court of Missouri · 2003
  2. Alexander v. D.L. Sitton Motor LinesSupreme Court of Missouri · 1993
  3. Kasl v. Bristol Care, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1999
  4. Martin v. Mid-America Farm Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1989
  5. Abel Ex Rel. Abel v. Mike Russell's Standard ServiceSupreme Court of Missouri · 1996

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API