Legal Opinion
Keen v. Keen
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided May 2, 1988PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*312On or about November 5, 1979, the plaintiff commenced the instant action by service of a summons with notice upon nearly all of the named defendants. Thereafter, the parties, through their attorneys, entered into various stipulations extending, sine die, the time periods within which both the complaint and an answer were to be served. Given these circumstances, the plaintiff has proffered a reasonable excuse for having not entered a default judgment within the statutory time period (see, CPLR 3215 [c]; Woodward v City of New York, 119 AD2d 749). Moreover, the plaintiff has demonstrated that…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- 5303 Realty Corp. v. O & Y Equity Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1984
- Grosso v. HauckAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
- Woodward v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
- Grossfeld v. BeckAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1973
- Di Carlo v. Bravo Tours, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
3Cited by6 opinions
- Manago v. GiorlandoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
- American Motor Club, Inc. v. Neu (In Re American Motor Club, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. New York · 1990
- Peterson v. KellyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
- Ali v. AhmadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- Shkolnik v. KrutoyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.