Legal Opinion

Ali v. Ahmad

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 12, 2005PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

In a shareholder’s derivative action, the defendants appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Polizzi, J.), dated June 28, 2004, which denied their motion to cancel a notice of pendency filed by the plaintiff.

Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, and the motion is granted; and it is further,

Ordered that the Queens County Clerk is directed to cancel the notice of pendency dated February 14, 2004, indexed against Block 8578, Lot 41.

A notice of pendency may be filed in any action “in which the judgment demanded would affect the title to, or the possession,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. 5303 Realty Corp. v. O & Y Equity Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1984
  2. In Re the Estate of SakowNew York Court of Appeals · 2002
  3. Gammal v. La Casita Milta, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
  4. Sears Mortgage Corp. v. YaghobiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
  5. Bennett v. JohnAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Plastic Surgery Group of Rochester, LLC v. EvangelistiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
  2. Shkolnik v. KrutoyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
  3. Goldberg v. LenihanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
  4. In re the Estate of RousonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
  5. DeCaro v. East of East, LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API