Legal Opinion
Continental Connector Corp. v. Continental Specialties Corp.
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided June 1, 1976No. Civ. N-75-35PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RULING ON PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO DISMISS DEFENDANTS’ COUNTERCLAIM
NEWMAN, District Judge.
Plaintiff’s motion to dismiss defendants’ counterclaim for lack of subject matter jurisdiction poses, according to the parties, an issue of first impression concerning a district court’s jurisdiction over the subject matter of a trademark opposition proceeding currently pending before a Trademark Trial and Appeal Board in the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Plaintiff initially invoked this Court’s diversity jurisdiction on February 13, 1975, with a complaint alleging diversity of citizenship and…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Romero v. International Terminal Operating Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Far East Conference v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
- Glidden Co. v. ZdanokSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- National Mutual Insurance v. Tidewater Transfer Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Goya Foods, Inc. v. Tropicana Products, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1988
- C-Cure Chemical Co., Inc. v. Secure Adhesives Corp.District Court, W.D. New York · 1983
- Continental Connector Corp. v. Continental Specialties Corp.District Court, D. Connecticut · 1979
- Jeno's Inc. v. Commissioner of Patents & TrademarksDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1980
- Look Magazine Enterprises S.A. v. Look, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 1984
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.