Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Jack Roach Ford v. De Urdanavia

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided September 8, 1983No. A14-82-349CVPublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

J. CURTISS BROWN, Chief Justice.

Luisa A. De Urdanavia (Mrs. De Urdana-via or appellee) sued Jack Roach Ford (appellant) and Ford Motor Company under the Deceptive Trade Practices Act (DTPA) for damages sustained as a result of alleged breaches of express and implied warranties and alleged misrepresentations surrounding the purchase of an automobile from Jack Roach Ford. Judgment was entered that Mrs. De Urdanavia take nothing in her action against Ford Motor Company and that she recover $500.00 in actual damages in her action against Jack Roach Ford. Judgment was further entered that…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Allied Finance Co. v. GarzaCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1981
  2. Flanigan v. CarswellTexas Supreme Court · 1959
  3. Smith v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1970
  4. Argonaut Ins. Co. v. ABC Steel Products Co., Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1979
  5. Pace v. McEwenCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1981

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. David McDavid Pontiac, Inc. v. Nix, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1984
  2. Swinnea v. ERI Consulting Engineers, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 12th District (Tyler)2007
  3. State v. Buckner Construction Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1985
  4. Ford Motor Co. v. Cooper, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2004
  5. Leggett v. Brinson, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)1991

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API