Legal Opinion

Bolus v. Carnicella, Esquire

District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania

Decided August 24, 2021No. 4:15-cv-01062Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA BRIAN BOLUS et al., No. 4:15-CV-01062 Plaintiffs, (Judge Brann) v. AMY CARNICELLA et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION AUGUST 24, 2021 Plaintiffs Brian Bolus, Karen Bolus, Preston Bolus, and Minuteman Spill Response, Inc. (“Minuteman”) initiated this action for damages under

42 U.S.C. § 1983

and Pennsylvania law.1 Plaintiffs allege that Defendants, all current or former employees at the Pennsylvania Office of the Attorney General (“OAG”), violated Plaintiffs’ rights under the Fourth, Fifth, and Fourteenth Amendment,…

2Cases cited101 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. Graham v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1989

96 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API