Legal Opinion

Adams v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided May 23, 1923No. 7746PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtHawkins, J.

The caption to the tran script fails to show when court convened or adjourned. The Assistant Attorney General has filed a motion asking the dismissal of the appeal because of such omission. The motion must be sustained. See Lowrey v. State, 92 Tex. Cr. R. 311, 244 S. W. 147; Mandosa v. State, 88 Tex. Cr. R. 84, 225 S. W. 169; Davis v. State, 88 Tex. Cr. R. 183, 226 S. W. 532.

We find in the record a statement of facts signed by the attorneys and approved by the trial judge on March 4, 19?3, but it is nowhere made to appear that it was ever filed in the court below. In felony cases the original…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Davis v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1920
  2. Mandosa v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1920
  3. Mandosa v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1920
  4. Bledsoe v. Pierce-Williams Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1921
  5. Lowrey v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1922

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Baker & Strawn v. Magnolia Petroleum Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API