State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Frelix
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CRIPPEN, Judge. *
Appellant John Frelix challenges the district court’s order that his petition for no-fault arbitration be dismissed. Because appellant incurred more than $40,000 for surgery expenses on the same day that his petition for arbitration was filed, thus exceeding the statutory jurisdictional limit, we affirm.
FACTS
Appellant was injured in a motor-vehicle accident in September 2001. He obtained treatment and submitted his medical expenses for payment to his no-fault insurer, respondent State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company. At respondent’s request, appellant…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Illinois Farmers Insurance Co. v. Glass Service Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2004
- Schoepke v. Alexander Smith & Sons Carpet Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1971
- Lewis-Miller v. RossSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2006
- Foster v. BrickSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1913
- Wakefield v. Federated Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Carmen Schroeder v. Western National Mutual Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2014