Legal Opinion

State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Frelix

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided April 28, 2009No. A08-1045PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CRIPPEN, Judge. *

Appellant John Frelix challenges the district court’s order that his petition for no-fault arbitration be dismissed. Because appellant incurred more than $40,000 for surgery expenses on the same day that his petition for arbitration was filed, thus exceeding the statutory jurisdictional limit, we affirm.

FACTS

Appellant was injured in a motor-vehicle accident in September 2001. He obtained treatment and submitted his medical expenses for payment to his no-fault insurer, respondent State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company. At respondent’s request, appellant…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Illinois Farmers Insurance Co. v. Glass Service Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2004
  2. Schoepke v. Alexander Smith & Sons Carpet Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1971
  3. Lewis-Miller v. RossSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2006
  4. Foster v. BrickSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1913
  5. Wakefield v. Federated Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1984

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Carmen Schroeder v. Western National Mutual Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API