Legal Opinion

Sizemore v. Cleveland County Assessor

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided November 13, 1984No. 59229Published

1Opinion of the Court

KAUGER, Justice.

The dispositive question presented is whether a partially constructed office building may be classified, and ad valorem taxes assessed at the rate of its intended *1055use, as an improvement to real property even if a certificate of occupancy has not been issued by the city where the property is located. We answer in the affirmative.

The appellants, Lawrence E. and Louise M. Sizemore, owned a building in Cleveland County which was damaged by fire in 1979. During 1981, the damaged building was removed, and construction was begun on a new building. The Sizemores stipulated that in…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Independent School District No. 9 v. GlassSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1982
  2. County of Maricopa v. North Central Development Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1977
  3. Union Portland Cement Co. v. Morgan CountyUtah Supreme Court · 1924
  4. People Ex Rel. 176 West 87th Street Corp. v. CantorNew York Court of Appeals · 1921
  5. Wagner v. Board of Review of GlenwoodSupreme Court of Iowa · 1942

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API