Legal Opinion
William v. Mecum
Supreme Court of New Jersey
Decided November 18, 1907PublishedCited by 5 opinions
On error to tlie Salem Circuit.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Hendkickson, J.
The above causes were tried together at the Salem Circuit, and the writs of error removing the judg*548ments for plaintiffs therein were by consent argued together here. The judgments were recovered upon lien claims for labor performed and materials furnished one Charles H. Muckenhirm in the erection and repairs of a certain frame building, with additions, for the purpose of a brass factory, located in the city of Salem. Just after the suit began bankruptcy proceedings were commenced against Mr. Muckenhirm in the United States District Court…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Van Alstyne v. Franklin Council No. 41Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1903
- Downingtown Manufacturing Co. v. Franklin Paper MillsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1899
3Cited by5 opinions
- WASHINGTON CONSTRUCTION CO., INC. v. SpinellaNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1951
- Hayes v. R. J. Jones & SonsLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1951
- Sikkema v. PackardNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1963
- Derbes v. MarshallLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1938
- Rigberg v. Narduc Development Corp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1957