Legal Opinion

Rigberg v. Narduc Development Corp.

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided November 27, 1957PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

47 N.J. Super. 588 (1957)

136 A.2d 444

WILLIAM RIGBERG, WILLIAM E. ROHLOFF AND BETTER ELECTRIC CO., A CORPORATION, PLAINTIFFS,

v.

NARDUC DEVELOPMENT CORP., DEFENDANT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Chancery Division.

Decided November 27, 1957.

Mr. Albert B. Melnik (Messrs. Hermann, Melnik & Lowengrub, attorneys), for Josiah E. DuBois, Jr., the receiver.

Mr. Mark Marritz (Mr. Abraham Greenberg, of counsel), for plaintiffs Rigberg and Rohloff.

Mr. Albert G. Driver, for John E. Bittner, a creditor.

HANEMAN, J.S.C.

This matter concerns itself with whether William Rigberg and William E. Rohloff are entitled…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. District Heights Apartments v. Noland Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1998
  2. Peerless Unit Ventilation Co. v. D'Amore Construction Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1933
  3. Earley v. HallSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1915
  4. Federal Trust Co. v. GuiguesNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1909
  5. Bohunek v. SmithOhio Court of Appeals · 1930

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Sikkema v. PackardNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1963
  2. Baldyga Constr. Co. v. HurffNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1980

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API