Legal Opinion

United States v. Tooma

District Court, E.D. Michigan

Decided October 18, 1960No. Civ. A. No. 16589PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LEVIN, Chief Judge.

This denaturalization action is brought on the ground that the order and certificate of naturalization were “procured by concealment of a material fact or by willful misrepresentation,” Sec. 340(a) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, 8 U.S.C.A. § 1451(a).

The defendant was born in Estonia in 1935 and lived there until that country was re-occupied by the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics in 1944, following the German defeat. In that year, the defendant and his mother and sister (his father was killed in 1942) moved to Austria and two years later traveled to the French…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Schneiderman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  2. Baumgartner v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  3. Knauer v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  4. Nowak v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  5. United States v. TuteurCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1954

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. United States v. FedorenkoDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 1978
  2. United States v. JammalDistrict Court, S.D. West Virginia · 2015
  3. United States v. SinghDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API