United States v. Jammal
District Court, S.D. West Virginia
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
ROBERT C. CHAMBERS, Chief Judge.
Pending before the Court is Plaintiff United States of America’s Motion for Summary Judgment, filed July 21, 2014. ECF No. 24. Plaintiff contends that Defendant Jammal was ineligible to naturalize as a United States citizen, and based on the material, undisputed facts in the record, it is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. For reasons explained below, Plaintiffs motion is GRANTED.
I. FACTUAL BACKGROUND
This dispute concerns Defendant’s naturalization as a United States citizen. According to Plaintiffs Complaint, and undisputed by…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Marian Fontenot, Etc. v. The Upjohn CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1986
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- United States v. Samih JammalCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2015