Legal Opinion · Dissent

State v. Sax

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided April 21, 1950No. 34,891Published

1DissentKnutson, Justice

I dissent. I do not believe that the mother of an illegitimate child has any right to appeal in her individual capacity from an order of the district court approving the payment of a lump sum in settlement of the liability of the father under M. S. A. 257.28. Consequently, I think that the appeal should be dismissed for the reason that if the mother has no right to appeal under our statutes we have no jurisdiction to consider the appeal.

Appellate jurisdiction cannot be conferred upon us by consent. Even though the right to appeal is not properly raised here, we cannot overlook it. Bulau v.…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Bulau v. BulauSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1940
  2. State v. NestavalSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1898
  3. Singer v. Allied Factors, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1944
  4. State Ex Rel. Bergin v. WashburnSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1947
  5. State v. JeffreySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1933

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API