Legal Opinion

Rudisell v. Jennings

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided May 15, 1906No. 5,739PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Erom Brown Circuit Court; W. J. Buckingham, Judge. Suit by Nathan M. Jennings against Bailey Rudisell and wife. Erom a decree for plaintiff, said Rudisell appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtWiley, J.

Appellee sued appellant and his wife upon a promissory note and to foreclose a chattel mortgage given to secure its payment. The court 'made a special finding of facts • and stated its conclusions of law thereon. By its conclusions of law the court held that appellant’s wife was not liable, and rendered judgment in her favor for costs, and against appellant upon the note and to foreclose the mortgage as to all the property described therein, except two cows, which the court found belonged to appellant’s wife.

*405Appellant moved for a venire de novo, for a new trial, and to modify the judgment,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Bayless v. GlennIndiana Supreme Court · 1880
  2. Godfrey v. GodfreyIndiana Supreme Court · 1861
  3. Kinnaman v. KinnamanIndiana Supreme Court · 1880
  4. Brownfield v. WeichtIndiana Supreme Court · 1857
  5. Eel River Railroad v. State ex rel. KistlerIndiana Supreme Court · 1896

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. In Re GreivesUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Indiana · 1987
  2. Indiana Union Traction Co. v. BenadumIndiana Court of Appeals · 1908
  3. Oglebay v. Tippecanoe Loan & Trust Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1907
  4. Symes v. FletcherSupreme Court of Vermont · 1921
  5. Rose v. OwenIndiana Court of Appeals · 1908

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API