Alabama Lime & Stone Co. v. Adams
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the CourtSayre, J.
On the former appeal (221 Ala. 10, 127 So. 544, 547) a number of defects in the present appellant’s bill as it then was were pointed out. It was in the bill in its original form averred that Adams, the present appellee, was insolvent. This averment we understand to intend insolvency in its general and popular meaning as denoting that appellee’s entire property and assets, if converted into money without unreasonable haste .or sacrifice, would be insufficient to pay his debts. 32 Corpus Juris, 805. The precise form of averment was; “That a judgment or decree against said John II. Adams for the…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Stewart v. BurginSupreme Court of Alabama · 1929
- Adams v. Alabama Lime Stone CorporationSupreme Court of Alabama · 1930
3Cited by13 opinions
- Percoff v. SolomonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1953
- Wood v. EstesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1932
- Cook v. WhiteheadSupreme Court of Alabama · 1951
- Premier Industrial Corporation v. MarlowSupreme Court of Alabama · 1974
- Johnston v. BridgesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1972
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.