Legal Opinion

Hubbard v. Lock Joint Pipe Co.

District Court, E.D. Missouri

Decided February 21, 1947No. 4906PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

70 F.Supp. 589 (1947)

HUBBARD

v.

LOCK JOINT PIPE CO.

No. 4906.

District Court, E. D. Missouri, E. D.

February 21, 1947.

Forrest M. Hemker, of St. Louis, Mo., for plaintiff.

George E. Heneghan, of St. Louis, Mo., for defendant.

HULEN, District Judge.

This is a personal injury action for damages resulting from collision of car driven by plaintiff and truck belonging to defendant. The jury's verdict was $5,000. Defendant's motion in the alternative, for judgment in accordance with motion for a directed verdict or for new trial, is before the Court. Three assignments have been briefed: (1) There is no…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Burgess v. Garvin Price Merc. Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1925
  2. Silent Automatic Sales Corporation v. StaytonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1930
  3. Roth v. Continental Wire Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1902
  4. Thomas v. SlavensCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1935

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Duffy v. Griffith Co.California Court of Appeal · 1962
  2. Hopkings v. Jl Case CompanySupreme Court of Missouri · 1956
  3. Johnston Testers, Inc. v. TaylorCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1958
  4. Canon v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1953
  5. Leverton v. HartsteinMissouri Court of Appeals · 1963

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API