Horowitz v. Rott
Michigan Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtFellows, J.
This is a summary proceeding brought before a circuit court commissioner to recover possession of premises in Detroit which had been sold under an executory land contract. Plaintiff there recovered and the amount due was found. On trial in the circuit court plaintiff again recovered and the amount due was again found. Defendants paid to the clerk the amount found due and later prosecuted this writ of error. We are, therefore, confronted with the question whether this court may review a judgment which has been satisfied and no longer exists. The amount found due is not a judgment for that…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Anway v. Grand Rapids Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1920
- People v. LeavittMichigan Supreme Court · 1879
- Ideal Furnace Co. v. International Molders' Union of North AmericaMichigan Supreme Court · 1918
- Security Investment Co. v. MeisterMichigan Supreme Court · 1921
- Clairview Park Improvement Co. of Grosse Pointe, Ltd. v. Detroit & Lake St. Clair RailwayMichigan Supreme Court · 1910
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- People v. MalloryMichigan Supreme Court · 1967
- Amerisure Insurance v. Auto-Owners InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 2004
- Trahey v. City of InksterMichigan Court of Appeals · 2015
- Amerisure Ins. Co. v. Auto-Owners Ins. Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 2004
- McCarthy v. Wayne Circuit JudgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1940
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.